![]() “You know that you will be stretched to the extreme limits of your abilities… a good deal of that drive has to stay with people throughout adolescence and as they enter the workforce. “The mindset of military service excellence is instilled in every citizen from childhood,” said Dr Applebaum. His sentiments are reflected by chairman and chief scientist of the Israeli Innovation Society Dr Ami Applebaum. Used with permission.Medved’s insight into Israel’s technology industry comes from his position as an American born Jewish man who relocated to the Holy Land some 40 years ago. Greg Stohr in Washington at contact the editor responsible for this story:Įlizabeth Wasserman at 2023 Bloomberg L.P. He filed a brief urging the high court to uphold provisions that require platforms to publish their standards and apply their rules “in a consistent manner.” ![]() The law also bars platforms from banning political candidates or “journalistic enterprises.” As with Texas, the Florida law applies only to the biggest social media companies.įlorida has support from former President Donald Trump. The 11th Circuit called that provision “particularly onerous.” The Florida law includes a dozen major provisions, including a requirement that platforms provide a “thorough rationale” for each content-moderation decision. The law applies to platforms with more than 50 million monthly users, a threshold that exempts conservative social media sites such as Parler and Gab. The law sets out procedures for user complaints, requires companies to disclose their content- and data-management practices and publish a sweeping biannual “transparency report.” The Texas law also imposes a number of operational and disclosure requirements. The prohibition includes a handful of exceptions, letting platforms bar content that incites violence or criminal activity or involves the sexual exploitation of children or the harassment of sexual-abuse survivors. The centerpiece of the Texas law is a sweeping provision that bars large platforms from discriminating based on viewpoint. ![]() The shift has been especially dramatic at X, which owner Elon Musk has said has he intends to make into a bastion for free speech. The case arrives even as social media companies pull back from their efforts to combat political falsehoods online. Texas, Florida and the trade groups all asked the Supreme Court to intervene on at least some of the issues in the two cases. The New Orleans-based 5th Circuit upheld the Texas law but left the measure on hold to allow time for an appeal to the Supreme Court. The Atlanta-based 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals blocked most of Florida’s law as probably violating the First Amendment. “If Big Tech censors enforce rules inconsistently, to discriminate in favor of the dominant Silicon Valley ideology, they will now be held accountable,” DeSantis, now a Republican presidential candidate, said when he signed his state’s bill into law in 2021.Ībbott decried “a dangerous movement by social media companies to silence conservative viewpoints and ideas” when he signed the Texas measure into law later that year. Social Media Laws Violate Speech Rights, DOJ Tells Supreme Courtįlorida Governor Ron DeSantis and Texas Governor Greg Abbott say the rules are needed to keep conservative voices from being silenced. The Biden administration is largely backing the challenges. The laws “pose a grave threat to how social media websites provide their services to users,” the trade associations argued in the Florida case. ![]() say the laws would impose onerous requirements and put platforms at risk of being overrun by spam and bullying. The groups - which represent Meta Platforms Inc., Alphabet Inc.’s Google and X Corp., the company formerly known as Twitter Inc. The measures are facing challenges from two industry trade associations, NetChoice LLC and the Computer & Communications Industry Association. The court will rule by the middle of next year. The justices will consider whether the Republican-backed measures violate the free speech rights of social media companies by limiting their freedom to decide how material is presented and requiring detailed explanations for content-moderation decisions. The US Supreme Court agreed to review Florida and Texas laws that would sharply restrict the ability of the largest social media platforms to police political misinformation in a case that will shape the rules online in the run-up to the 2024 election. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |